Side-by-side overview
accessiBe vs UserWay
This table summarizes publicly documented capabilities. Confirm current plan inclusions directly with each vendor.
| Area | accessiBe | UserWay |
|---|---|---|
| Visitor widget | accessWidget with profiles and individual controls | Free and paid widget options with user-triggered controls |
| Runtime remediation | Eligible rendered-page corrections through accessWidget | Paid AI widget documents runtime remediations without rewriting source code |
| Website scanning | accessScan plus accessFlow crawling | Free checker and Accessibility Monitor |
| Monitoring | Recurring scans through accessWidget and accessFlow | Sitemap-based Monitor with desktop/mobile coverage and alerts |
| Developer workflow | accessFlow SDK, MCP, CI/CD, tickets, and code fixes | Monitor includes screenshots, code guidance, and issue-tracker integrations |
| Expert services | Audits, user testing, VPAT, file remediation, and support services | Audits and broader services are offered by UserWay and the Level Access ecosystem |
| Public pricing | Pricing varies by product and plan | Published widget bundles vary by traffic and features |
AuditYourWeb workflow
From detection to verification
Scan
Start with a public URL
Locate
Find affected routes or code
Fix
Apply a practical change
Rescan
Check the implementation again
Widget and visitor experience
Both vendors provide visitor-facing controls and disability-oriented profiles. accessiBe positions accessWidget as one layer in a three-part platform. UserWay offers a free widget for user-triggered adjustments and paid widget tiers with automated remediation and additional features.
For either product, test the interface itself by keyboard and screen reader, verify that it does not cover page controls, and measure performance on the actual website rather than relying only on vendor claims.
Scanning and monitoring
accessiBe separates its public accessScan tool from the deeper accessFlow workflow. UserWay Monitor reads a sitemap, lets teams select pages, scans desktop and mobile resolutions, and documents screenshots and issue details.
Ask how authenticated routes, dynamic states, user flows, documents, and content behind consent or location gates are handled. A sitemap crawl alone cannot represent every state of a modern application.
Developer tools and remediation
accessFlow publicly documents code examples, personalized fixes, ticketing, CI/CD support, an SDK, and MCP-based IDE integration. UserWay Monitor documents code guidance, affected-element screenshots, prioritization, and exports to tools including Jira, Trello, Asana, and GitHub.
The best choice depends on whether your developers need repository-time checks, rendered-page evidence, workflow integrations, runtime corrections, or a combination.
How to choose between them
Create a representative test site with missing labels, low contrast, invalid ARIA, focus errors, dynamic updates, and custom components. Run the same tasks through each product you can access and document what is detected, explained, changed, and missed.
Pricing should be compared using the same traffic, page, domain, support, and service assumptions. A low entry price and a broader enterprise quote are not equivalent scopes.
A third approach for smaller teams
AuditYourWeb combines a visitor widget, public website scanner, deep route scan, and CLI/CI source scanner in a smaller self-serve workflow. It does not currently match the full service portfolio of either established vendor.
That narrower scope may be useful when direct access, transparent findings, and developer ownership matter more than enterprise services.
Methodology and disclosure
This page uses publicly available product pages, help-center documentation, terms, and regulatory or standards guidance. Features and plan boundaries may change. We label vendor claims as vendor claims and avoid treating an unavailable detail as a missing feature.
AuditYourWeb is an accessibility software product and competes with products discussed here. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by accessiBe or UserWay. Product names and trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Evidence
Sources reviewed
- accessWidget product overviewaccessiBe
- accessFlow developer platform overviewaccessiBe
- Documented accessWidget technology limitationsaccessiBe Help Center
- UserWay Accessibility Widget overview and public plansUserWay
- UserWay free and paid widget comparisonUserWay
- UserWay Accessibility Monitor overviewUserWay
- UserWay product limitations and termsUserWay
- Selecting web accessibility evaluation toolsW3C Web Accessibility Initiative
Continue researching
Related guides and products
Use your own website as evidence
See the detectable accessibility issues on your website.
Start with a free page scan. No product comparison can replace testing the website your team actually maintains.
Run a free scan